Skip to main content
AI-powered analysis of your repository’s wellness based on 30 days of activity.

Key Metrics

Core Health Factors

  • Health Score: Overall rating with confidence level
  • Lottery Factor: Knowledge concentration risk (20% weight)
  • Self-Selection: How contributors choose their work
  • Response Time: Average PR merge duration (10% weight)
  • Activity Level: Repository engagement intensity

Enhanced Contributor Metrics (New)

  • Contributor Diversity: Comprehensive team distribution including:
    • Pull request authors
    • Issue creators
    • Code reviewers
    • Discussion participants
  • Issue Engagement: Unique issue authors engaging with the project (15% weight)
  • Review & Discussion Quality: Combined review coverage and reviewer diversity (15% weight)
    • Tracks percentage of PRs receiving reviews
    • Rewards having multiple diverse reviewers (2 points per unique reviewer, max 20 points)

Confidence Score Calculation

The repository confidence score evaluates contribution sustainability through:
  1. Star/Fork Conversion: How effectively stars and forks convert to contributions
  2. Engagement Conversion: Issue and comment engagement leading to contributions
  3. Contributor Retention: Retention rates over time windows
  4. Contribution Quality: PR success rates and merge patterns

Visual Indicators

🟢 Green = Healthy (Score > 70)
🟡 Yellow = Needs attention (Score 40-70)
🔴 Red = Critical (Score < 40)
Trend arrows show if metrics are improving or declining.

Data Sources

Health metrics now pull from multiple sources for comprehensive analysis:
  • Pull requests and reviews
  • GitHub events cache (issues, reviews, comments)
  • Discussion participation
  • Contributor activity patterns